Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:2015 India Pakistan Border Skirmishes

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  Redirect to India–Pakistan border skirmishes (2014–present). If the redirect isn't appropriate, then take it over to RfD. MorbidEntree - (Talk to me! (っ◕‿◕)っ♥) (please reply using &#x7B;&#x7B;ping&#x7D;&#x7D;) 02:57, 13 August 2016 (UTC)

Draft:2015 India Pakistan Border Skirmishes

 * (Time stamp for bot to properly relist.) North America1000 01:13, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
 * (Time stamp for bot to properly relist.) North America1000 01:13, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

Draft already covered by India–Pakistan border skirmishes (2014–present). Ricky81682 (talk) 18:31, 23 July 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Redirect to India–Pakistan border skirmishes (2014–present). --SmokeyJoe (talk) 12:34, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:13, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - The editor created this in Sep 2015 and then seemed to have buggered off, No one is going to search for "Draft:2015 India Pakistan Border Skirmishes" and "India–Pakistan border skirmishes (2014–present)" is obviously an article so this to me seems all but a pointless redirect, Better off deleted IMHO. – Davey 2010 Talk 15:13, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Draftspace doesn't exist to support the Wikipedia search engine, that point is irrelevant. Redirects are cheap.  IF the nominator is correct, just redirect.  IF at any time someone discovers the nominator was not correct, the wiki way enables the history to be viewed at any time, and the material re-used, or even the redirection reverted.  There is no proper role for MfD here.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 14:41, 5 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Redirects are cheap however in this case it would be serving purpose whatsoever - There's no point redirecting when the better option is to delete it, All Redirects on this project have to serve atleast some purpose ... I mean it's why RFD was created, If the redirect is serving no purpose and the content here is already in the article above then bestest thing to do is delete it. – Davey 2010 Talk 15:29, 5 August 2016 (UTC)
 * The some purpose is to redirect the author when he returns, when he returns following his memory or device bookmarks. Or to direct a similar newcomer erroneously thinking that this topic needed draftspace drafting.  When a mistake happens once, it should be assumed possible to happen again.  I didn't think it was common for draftspace redirects to the topic in mainspace to be nominated at RfD.  I would oppose such actions.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 00:44, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
 * But the creator isn't going to return, Sure he could but it's extremely unlikely he will thus making it useless, Anyway we clearly have different opinions etc so best to leave it at that, – Davey 2010 Talk 01:09, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.