Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:2017 PSMS Medan season

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  Already speedy-deleted. Jjjjjjdddddd (talk) 09:50, 31 January 2018 (UTC)

Draft:2017 PSMS Medan season


Delete, as it is blank, and the article from the year before was deleted on A3. Jjjjjjdddddd (talk) 04:10, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete Blank per nom. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 04:35, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
 * What? I was suggesting it be deleted, because it is blank. Jjjjjjdddddd (talk) 04:39, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Umm. The nominator de-tagged the CSD#A3 tagging of this when it was a blank mainspace page.  I trust you don't do this out of habit.  Delete as it should have been deleted on 16 July 2017‎.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 04:39, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
 * My reasoning was that, because it was so new, it wouldn't be a good idea to delete it outright, instead of draftifying it. Now, as the creator appears to have abandoned it, I believe it can be safely deleted. Jjjjjjdddddd (talk) 04:44, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Fair enough. With the benefit of hindsight, I'd say that the Criteria_for_speedy_deletion note "Consensus has developed that in most cases articles should not be tagged for deletion under this criterion moments after creation as the creator may be actively working on the content; though there is no set time requirement, a ten-minute delay before tagging under this criterion is suggested as good practice. Please do not mark the page as patrolled prior to that suitable delay passing, so that the wait does not result in the article escaping review at a later time." remains a good rule of thumb with respect to the ~ ten minute mark.  User:Robert McClenon was correct to tag it at 47 minutes, and the appropriate message was left at User_talk:Pass.retrieve. Within the hour, the page was draftified without redirect, no explanation to the author, I bet the author knew nothing of its continued existence in DraftSpace.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 05:03, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
 * True, it would had been better if we had notified the creator of the move. Jjjjjjdddddd (talk) 05:14, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
 * I think the gadgets have improved. User:Evad37/MoveToDraft.js, anyway.  I have just edited Drafts to point to that one, and asked their authors.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 06:32, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.