Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:2042 FIFA World Cup

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 21:08, 19 July 2018 (UTC)

Draft:2042 FIFA World Cup


There was a AFD that just ended in a Snow delete. This isn't going to be an article for years. WP:TOOSOON. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 17:51, 9 July 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete Having this in the Draft namespace does not change the fact that it's just WP:TOOSOON. SemiHypercube ✎ 12:20, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Hhkohh (talk) 13:33, 10 July 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep Why not just go to WP:CSD after several months? I do not see any good reason to delete now. Hhkohh (talk) 13:33, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete - doesn't need to be thought about for 20 years... GiantSnowman 13:37, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete per the clarity of Articles for deletion/2042 FIFA World Cup. Future world cups may be organised/drafted as subpages of WikiProject Football, do not draft them in draftspace. Simply delete to there being no information content in the draft, it is merely a placeholder. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 05:09, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
 * That's a pretty arbitrary distinction. If what you say is true, why shouldn't WP Football be able to use draft space for this purpose? — This, that and the other (talk) 11:33, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
 * They could, but why would they? DraftSpace is a mostly hidden place for waylaying spammers and inept newcomers, and when they give up, their work is auto-deleted. Everything there is ostensibly unowned, uncared for. See also User:A2soup/Don't use draftspace. In WkikProject subpages, their subpages are easily found, and collectively discussed on the main WikiProject talk page.  Pages devoted to topics planned decades in the future need that sort of organisational structure. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 11:44, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
 * I concur. It is rarely appropriate for anyone who is adequately informed about draftspace or AfC to, rationally, choose to use them. — Godsy (TALK CONT ) 18:18, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete Per WP:CRYSTAL. The Duke of Nonsense What is necessary for thee?.  13:18, 12 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete. It will be notable in the future and an editor can recreate it then. For now it is WP:TOOSOON. Salt for 20 years. The editor  whose username is Z0 13:54, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.