Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:5105 N Utica ave Tulsa Ok Historucal Population

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: Deleted in bundle. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 00:16, 15 April 2018 (UTC)

Draft:5105 N Utica ave Tulsa Ok Historucal Population


WP:NOTINDISCRIMINATE, no sources or other content. Jjjjjjdddddd (talk) 05:37, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
 * it’s blank! You could G2 it, or blank it.  But to create an MfD page to discuss a blank page whose fault is being blank, that’s stupid.  Stop wasting others time.  —SmokeyJoe (talk) 06:03, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
 * It wasn't blank when I found it. You blanked it. Jjjjjjdddddd (talk) 06:08, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
 * I fully blanked it to show you how easy it is. That fully deals with the maintenance tracking nuisance issues.  As there are several similar pages, all by the same author on the same day with the same template without content, it could be worth a group nomination, but I still reckon just blank them all.  SmokeyJoe (talk) 06:48, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
 * I could blank them, but it's rare that pages are blanked rather than deleted. Jjjjjjdddddd (talk) 06:53, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
 * How would you know? SmokeyJoe (talk) 06:59, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Just look at MfD precedent for drafts. Most discussions end in "Keep", "Delete", "Userfy", etc. Jjjjjjdddddd (talk) 07:36, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Blanking means it doesn’t come to mfd. You’ll find there is a lot of blanking, absolute and templated (eg Userpage blanked) that happens without fanfare. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 08:31, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Why would we blank instead of deleting though? Jjjjjjdddddd (talk) 08:35, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Policy. Not demand admin actions where not required. Not hide good faith contributions for the contributors.  Enable cleaning of draftspace and maintenance categories by ordinary editorial actions.  Not require a high profile forum discussion for trivial things. Allow the returning previously inactive editor to immediately review and possibly recover their old ideas.  Leave deletion fora to deal with things that have actual reasons to delete, ie don’t dilute the importance of this place with busywork. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 10:54, 7 April 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep and undo the blanking. No policy-based reason for deletion has been stated. "unsourced" is not a reason for deletion of a draft. DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 20:16, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.