Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:52nd Street (song)

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  Redirect. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 21:55, 11 October 2016 (UTC)

Draft:52nd Street (song)

 * (Time stamp for bot to properly relist.) — Godsy (TALK CONT ) 03:21, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
 * (Time stamp for bot to properly relist.) — Godsy (TALK CONT ) 03:21, 15 September 2016 (UTC)

Non-notable song, an album track which did not chart. The user who started this draft has been edit-warring it into mainspace. Binksternet (talk) 15:37, 23 August 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Redirect, with temporary protection. A valid drafting idea, but the IP is wrong, mainspace may not link to draftspace.  I think it is very unlikely the cmmunity will agree to a standalone article for this song, as the appropriate place for everything that can be said is at 52nd Street (album).  No opposition to "delete and redirect", if someone wants to use deletion as a behavioural remediation hammer, but the redirect serves to inform future editors that improvement to coverage of the song should be done at the article 52nd Street (album), and any associated discussion belongs Talk:52nd Street (album).  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 23:55, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep in draftspace. This draft is not suitable at this time for moving to the mainspace, as it is completely unsourced and contains hardly any information. However, the draft was created only three days ago, and it may be possible to establish notability for the song. (I participated in an AfD for another Billy Joel album track and helped it pass the AfD.) Per the Manual of Style, this draft should not be linked to from the mainspace while it is still a draft. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 01:39, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep. Recent draft that has legitimate possibilities, so there is no good reason for deletion. Misbehavior by an editor should be dealt with more directly. --RL0919 (talk) 23:58, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Godsy (TALK CONT ) 03:21, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - Had it not been created by an IP I would've straight up !voted Keep however this was obviously created by one and so in the next 2-3 weeks the IP would've gained a new IP and this probably would be left to rot ... and then in a month to a year will end up here again, I have absolutely no objections to an editor recreating this (or going to WP:UNDELETE) (Even if the IP creates an account I would happily !vote Keep but at the moment this would end up being forgotten and abandoned so better off deleted and recreated by someone who's perhaps more serious about editing it and getting it in to articlespace). – Davey 2010' Talk 18:26, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.