Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:5up

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  Oversighted. Oversighted by PhilKnight  dud  hhr  Contribs 20:00, 13 October 2021 (UTC) (non-admin closure)  dud  hhr  Contribs 20:00, 13 October 2021 (UTC)

Draft:5up

 * – (View MfD) &#8203;

Serious BLP issues. I moved the article to draft to get it out of searches, but even so; the article starts with the "real name" of 5up, but this bit of information is unverifiable. Then we have things like "He was raised as a young child by his older brother" which is not in the source (the source states "5up has one older brother and was raised in Phoenix, Arizona."). Which casts doubt on other information in the article which isn't in the source either. Best to simply delete this as too much of a BLP violation. Fram (talk) 16:19, 11 October 2021 (UTC)


 * , does the content have too much WP:OUTING? Should it be sent to oversight?  AngusW🐶🐶F  ( bark  •  sniff ) 16:29, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Perhaps, but I'ld like it if someone first checked if I wasn't missing something. And it isn't WP:OUTING (which solely deals with information about other editors), but WP:BLPPRIVACY: but that needs to be referred to oversight as well, so your point remains valid of course. Fram (talk) 16:40, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
 * He was also born at a very young age. It’s not a BLP issue that it is unsourced that he has an unnamed elder brother. Unworthy of Oversight. It’s just pedestrian NOTWEBHOSTing. Delete now that we are here, but could have been left for G13, G13 was made for exactly this sort of thing. SmokeyJoe (talk) 02:38, 12 October 2021 (UTC)


 * referenced, “5up was born on … has 719k subscribers on his YouTube channel and 915k on his Twitch.”
 * This is not a BLPPRIVATE issue for Wikipedia.
 * Delete, NOTFACEBOOK, NOTSOCIALMEDIA. This is not the making of anything suitable for Wikipedia. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 02:34, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
 * you have missed the two things objected to here: the supposed "real name" of 5up (not in source, not mentioned elsewhere, so a BLPPRIVATE issue), and the claim that he was raised by his elder brother (not in source, so BLP violation). Fram (talk) 06:47, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
 * as always ping gone wrong... Fram (talk) 06:48, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Ok yes, misread. Delete per nom.  —SmokeyJoe (talk) 06:56, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
 * I have contacted oversight. Fram (talk) 12:27, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
 * It’s below my threshold for oversight. He’s probably revealed his mother’s maiden name on YouTube and twitch. Buts it’s nice that Wikipedia has exemplary standards. SmokeyJoe (talk) 13:33, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Considering that he only recently did a "face reveal" (I know, great news), it seems quite possible that he hasn't revealed his real name. Maintaining anonimity is slightly easier if people don't know your name. Fram (talk) 13:55, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
 * After some consideration, I have oversight deleted the page. PhilKnight (talk) 15:26, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.