Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:666

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  redirect to 666 (number). &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 18:25, 11 August 2021 (UTC)

Draft:666

 * – (View MfD) &#8203;

WP:666 linked to this page. To prevent unnecessary misunderstanding, please delete this page. q28 (talk) 20:06, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Coincidentally, when I finished the submission work, my edit count just stopped at 2134, so my hunch is that this article will be deleted without a hitch.humor-inline Say something serious: your wiki does not create this template, and for that, I have a complaint to make about this wiki! --q28 (talk) 20:10, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
 * P.S.: I made my 2136th edit for it, so I'm still cursed. --q28 (talk) 20:15, 30 July 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete. The subject already exist in mainspace. enjoyer -- talk 23:10, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete as there is already an article on this. Rubbish computer Ping me or leave a message on my talk page 12:38, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete or redirect to 666 (number). We don't need a separate page for this. J I P  &#124; Talk 15:43, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment - I rejected this draft in March, and it still doesn't need deleting. Robert McClenon (talk) 22:10, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Redirect to 666 (number). Robert McClenon (talk) 22:10, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment - Existing in article space has never been a reason to delete a draft and still is not a reason to delete a draft. Robert McClenon (talk) 22:10, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Redirect to 666 (number) as a duplicate. —  csc -1 03:41, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep as is, and leave for G13. It was REJECTED, which was the right thing to do, and has not been resubmitted. REJECT is the right process, bringing it to MfD is not.  —SmokeyJoe (talk) 14:27, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Redirect, but to 666 (not the page specifically about the number) as there is nothing in the draft's title that indicates why it should redirect to the specific article on the number rather than the dab page. 192.76.8.91 (talk) 14:21, 9 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete. This is a "draft" only in the technical sense of being a page in the Draft namespace. The content is a one-line opinion about the number, and was probably never intended to become an article. There is also no reason to block up the title with a redirect. --RL0919 (talk) 23:50, 9 August 2021 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.