Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:75 Alternative Words to use instead of 'said'

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 16:13, 5 April 2021 (UTC)

Draft:75 Alternative Words to use instead of 'said'

 * – (View MfD) &#8203;

Unencyclopedic, rejected AfC submission. There is no way to make this encyclopedic. – Mario Mario  456  15:06, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Since you've brought this here, Delete per WP:NOTDICTIONARY (though WP:NOTTHESAURUS is probably a more appropriate link) but this really didn't need an MfD discussion and should have been allowed to go G13. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 15:46, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. No point in waiting for G13 for something that can never be usable. BD2412  T 16:26, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, with the IP's caveats. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 17:05, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and WP:NOTDIC. —  csc -1 17:45, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete - Needed declining or rejecting. Was rejected.  Didn't need to come here.  Robert McClenon (talk) 16:33, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.