Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:A. V. Boldachev

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: keep. Still being twiddled with, even if not being majorly improved. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 03:23, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

Draft:A. V. Boldachev


Speedy G13 tags removed twice but no progress on article. Not notable topic Legacypac (talk) 00:32, 14 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep - Notability does not apply in draftspace. A2soup (talk) 07:11, 15 June 2017 (UTC)
 * No policy requires the retention of material in Draft space indefinately that is unsuitable for mainspace. If not delete it now, when? Legacypac (talk) 15:13, 15 June 2017 (UTC)
 * You seem to think that deletion is the default action and a positive case must be made for keeping a draft. The reality is the opposite - a positive case is required to delete. That is why deletion requires an MfD nom but keeping takes no action. Either when G13 applies or (controversially) when a case for irretrievable staleness can be made, as I know you know perfectly well. No one would call this draft (which is <1 year old, had a different username than the creator remove a G13 template <1 month before your nom, and was edited mere hours before you posted this comment) "stale". A2soup (talk) 18:32, 15 June 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep per WP:NMFD. — Godsy (TALK CONT ) 14:26, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.