Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:A Nuance Approach to Restorative Justice in US

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  keep.  —&#8288;Scotty Wong &#8288;— 17:33, 17 May 2023 (UTC)

Draft:A Nuance Approach to Restorative Justice in US

 * – (View MfD) &#8203;

Does not fit the purpose of WP. Looks like a school essay. PalauanReich🗣️ 17:54, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
 * IAR Speedy keep : That's because it is one. Don't mess about with ongoing WikiEdu classes if they aren't causing disruption. How did you find this anyways? Curbon7 (talk) 18:00, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
 * This CSD request is completely inappropriate by the way. Curbon7 (talk) 18:02, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Just a general comment: WikiEdu is for students to learn about writing Wikipedia articles; it does not override the WP:NOTWEBHOST policy, we're still not a free web host for students to write about whatever they want. I will notify the coordinator about this discussion. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 15:14, 6 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Hi @Ivanvector and everyone in this discussion. This student work is definitely not fit to be on mainspace for all the reasons already mentioned in this discussion: original research essay, no in line citations, refs to wiki articles. We stress to our students to write in a neutral, encyclopedic style, but there's always a handful that write good college essays, despite our trainings.
 * Rather than keep it in draftspace, I'd like to userfy it so they can rework it into something acceptable for WP. Of course, I will contact the student and instructor to explain what improvements are needed, and I will review it to make sure it's fit for mainspace. Does that sound alright? Brianda (Wiki Ed) (talk) 19:20, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Userify per above. Curbon7 (talk) 23:14, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep Wiki Education creation. Will likely be abandoned when the term is over. Uhai (talk) 21:53, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
 * I am leaning delete as the essay is original research based on a novel synthesis of various sources, and in general is a topic already covered by Restorative justice and does not improve our coverage, but I have notified the instructor and WMF coordinators of this discussion. I'm not too familiar with WikiEdu but from what I can tell students are assigned topics to write about, and they're supposed to write a draft and then another student reviews it before it's promoted to mainspace, kind of like the quid pro quo requirement in WP:DYK, and then they're graded on things by the instructor. The student who wrote this topic wrote it in a user sandbox (User:Editi2000/Restorative practices) and then promoted it to mainspace themselves, without any review having happened, and so the review fell on new page patrol. It's unsuitable as an article and was draftified for improvement, and here we are. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 16:31, 6 May 2023 (UTC)


 * Wait until the WikiEd co-ordinator can reply to Ivanector about what is going on here. I don't want to interrupt WikiEd's operations, but WP:NOTWEBHOST still needs to be acknowleged. I am open to re-evaluating my position once the co-ordinator responds. If they don't respond, count my vote as Delete per WP:NOTWEBHOST. JML1148 (Talk &#124; Contribs) 06:30, 7 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep for now. It isn't clear what is going on until Ivanvector checks with the WikiEdu coordinator, but the rules about draft space are loose and expansive, and stuff that is in draft space that is unsuitable for article space is usually declined rather than deleted.  Never should have been in article space; isn't in article space.  Waiting for feedback.  Robert McClenon (talk) 15:40, 7 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Userfy per Briandas comment. Nobody  ( talk ) 07:31, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Weak keep or userfy. In an ideal world, this would have been created in userspace and stayed there until worked on quite a bit more, and bits possibly(?not clear if warranted) integrated into Restorative justice. Unfortunately it ended up briefly an main space, and was rightly booted to Draft. It can stay there until it matures (if ever) or the clock runs out, so there is no need to delete it (hence my week keep). However, it would be even better if moved back to user space for user to work on (a lot) more. Martinp (talk) 12:32, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.