Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Abdulnasser Gharem

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was speedy deleted. I am not sure whether A10 should be applied to drafts, but G6 + IAR does the trick. JohnCD (talk) 15:07, 15 June 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Abdulnasser Gharem


There was already a more developed and pre-existing draft about this artist which is now in mainspace. There's nothing new in this one that would justify a content merge. &mdash;Anne Delong (talk) 11:59, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Has there been a discussion on whether A10 could apply to a draft like this? Other than namespace, I don't see how this case is any more controversial than any other application of A10.   Gigs (talk) 15:23, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
 * You are right. So I added Db-a10 to the top of the page. -- P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:08, 15 June 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.