Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Abhyuday

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  keep for now. No prejudice against renomination if it continues to be resubmitted without improvement. RL0919 (talk) 20:20, 7 July 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Abhyuday


Author has resubmitted the same list of and events within the organizations. Wikipedia is not a yearbook or a newsletter for the organization. It is not a website site map. This needs a fundamental rewrite to even be anything remotely close to being a decent article. AngusWOOF ( bark  •  sniff ) 21:17, 26 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Neutral - Hasn't been resubmitted since it was Rejected. This is what Rejection was for, to take this load off MFD.  Robert McClenon (talk) 22:57, 26 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep per Robert McClenon. The AfC process involved applying the Reject option.  It should sit for six months until G13 applies.  The reviewer might have been wrong, six months is a good time to allow for a considered response.  We delete if it is knee-jerk resubmitted.  MfD is not well used to second judge every reviewers reject submission.  If it needs rapid deletion, a WP:CSD criterion will apply, usually G11.  If you think it is being used in violation of NOTWEBHOST, report the pageviews numbers as your evidence.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 02:44, 27 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Comment to User:SmokeyJoe - This wasn't a case of second-guessing the reviewer. The rejecting reviewer and the nominator were both User:AngusWOOF.  It appears to me to be a good-faith error by the nominating reviewer.  Robert McClenon (talk) 04:31, 27 June 2019 (UTC)
 * , that's fine. I can wait for it to be resubmitted despite the stop sign and multiple advisements not to listcruft all the events. AngusWOOF  ( bark  •  sniff ) 04:37, 27 June 2019 (UTC)


 * AngusWOOF is asking us MfD reviewers to second stamp his reject decision with a bigger bang. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 04:58, 27 June 2019 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.