Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Abigail Verona Wilson

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  delete. ‑Scottywong | [confess] || 06:20, 6 March 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Abigail Verona Wilson

 * – (View MfD)

uncited BLP

(tho possibly an even better solution would be for bLP Prod to apply in draft space )  DGG ( talk ) 06:37, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
 * This is more WP:CSD than WP:BLPPROD, I feel. Either way, delete. &#32; Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 06:45, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep per Robert McClenon below . (was Weak delete I concur with ) . My preference would be to wait six months, but even though there's nothing to keep here, either. Deletion strikes me as a bit BITEy. Doug Mehus T · C  14:02, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete. Support BLPPROD in draftspace. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 08:53, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Neutral - Doesn't need deleting yet. By the way, I strongly disagree with applying BLPPROD to draft space, because draft space should be available for the sourcing of slow-to-source draft BLPs.  Robert McClenon (talk) 23:50, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep. It's a draft article BLPPROD shouldn't matter (with the exception of attack pages or wholly negative articles). Much more efficient to just let it run its course in AfC instead of clogging MfD with drafts like this.Sulfurboy (talk) 00:49, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Agreed completely. I'll have to read and re-read through the NPP materials to see why so many drafts are being nominated at MfD, but honestly, if they're not being tendentiously moved back to Main: namespace or something and they're not a G10, I don't see why we don't just tag them with AfC and let natural processes take care of it. ;-) Doug Mehus T · C  01:08, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.