Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:About PolicyX.com

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  Delete. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 10:48, 5 October 2015 (UTC)

Draft:About PolicyX.com


Article has been rejected 3 times within 24 hours. --I am  Kethrus    Talk to me!   09:54, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep Comment - The article was submitted three times in 24 hours. I agree. But, that doesn't mean the article has no scope and is non-improvable. If the editor submitted the draft repeatedly, then the editor should've been warned, and that was not done here. After all, the author did make some changes after each time the article was declined. I don't think submitting multiple times is a reason to delete this draft. Regards— ☮ JAaron95  Talk   10:18, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
 * I don't believe there is any room for improvement on this article, I believe there's a strong chance of there being a conflict of interest. There have also been no edits since the miscellany for deletion has been submitted. --I am  Kethrus    Talk to me!   21:45, 14 September 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete I agree with that "3x decline in 24 hours" is not really a valid reason for deletion (and the draft has only existed for two weeks anyway). However, I am finding zero non-PRIMARY sources about this company. Information is scarce enough that I wonder if it isn't just an elaborate hoax by the guy claiming to run it. Primefac (talk) 01:41, 17 September 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.