Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Acharya Institutes

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: No consensus This closure does not bar someone from redirecting, which is an editorial action that does not require a deletion discussion. * Pppery * it has begun... 17:51, 2 July 2024 (UTC)

Draft:Acharya Institutes

 * – (View MfD) &#8203;

Acharya Institute of Technology already exists. This draft was written by an editor now blocked for UPE and relies entirely on primary sources. Nthep (talk) 09:50, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
 * , I think it's G5-able. See Sockpuppet investigations/Acharya7317. Cabayi (talk) 10:24, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Acharya Institute of Technology just underwent a massive rewrite by User:Nandalal_acharya -- MacAddct1984 (talk &#124; contribs) 13:53, 25 June 2024 (UTC)


 * Weak Delete - The block for the originator does not say that it is a sock block, but that it is a UPE block, which would mean that the block was after the page was created. If the originator and the blocked account are not tied together, then the page can be kept, and allowed to die after six months.  But a CheckUser says that is is probably G5.  Robert McClenon (talk) 20:16, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
 * , no CU tools were used. Please do not assume that everything a checkuser does involves use of the tools or is done in the user's capacity as a checkuser. All the evidence is laid out at the SPI case. Cabayi (talk) 05:18, 23 June 2024 (UTC)


 * Keep: “Already exists” goes to WP:SRE, and a need to check the histories due to the ambiguity of “already” and the possibility that someone is trying to improperly hide an older draft for articlecountis reasons. The use of primary sources is never a reason to delete a draft.  The author being blocked is not a reason to delete unless the request comes from a checkuser or an SPI clerk; MfD must not be used for shadow clerking of SPI. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 14:18, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Speedy redirect as draft of already existing article. 🪐Kepler-1229b &#124; talk &#124; contribs🪐 05:08, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.