Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Adam Elcock MRICS chartered surveyor

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was Delete. — xaosflux  Talk 16:44, 24 April 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Adam Elcock MRICS chartered surveyor


No content, and source searches are providing no significant coverage in reliable sources to warrant an article. North America1000 10:28, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
 * There is something pathetically absurd in creating individual community discussions over pages like this. Has someone been declining CSD#G2 on these sort of things? --SmokeyJoe (talk) 23:36, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
 * It may not have been a test page. This discussion was created as a nomination to delete the page, per the rationale provided herein. Not really pathetic or absurd really; rather, discussion is congruent with obtaining input from other users and obtaining consensus. North America1000 00:00, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
 * It is a completely blank page by a single edit account. G2 I suggest.  Or ignore it until it is G13-ed.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 00:06, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
 * WP:G13 will never qualify for this page, because it was never a part of the WikiProject Articles for creation process. North America1000 00:49, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
 * I'm still confused by that. You may have answered before, but why not?  Why does G13 not cover all DraftSpace?  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 00:55, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
 * I'd have to research the matter (e.g. scour talk page discussions) to find out why all draft pages do not apply to G13, but I'm not particularly interested in doing so at this time. North America1000 01:09, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
 * The top thread at WT:CSD seems to be all about this. I completely agree with DGG's post of 17:29, 24 January 2016.  Maybe I missed some of the discussion, but it is my recollection that the intent was for all these drafts to be covered.  It is a bit confused I supposed because DraftSpace was created at the end of the process.
 * A blank page not in userspace is covered by G2. Delete as a test with no content.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 01:24, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
 * A blank page not in userspace is covered by G2. Delete as a test with no content.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 01:24, 19 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete. It's not a test as the editor clearly intended to create a draft there but didn't understand the difference between the edit summary and the page (there's a lot of pages like that using the Article Wizard). I'd argue for G7 deletion but that the letter of it and not in its spirit. Either way, it's a draft from September that hasn't been edited with no sources on someone likely not notable. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 22:11, 19 April 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.