Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Addison`s journal Essay 2022 7th grade

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  speedy delete. TonyBallioni (talk) 23:11, 23 September 2022 (UTC)

Draft:Addison`s journal Essay 2022 7th grade

 * – (View MfD) &#8203;

Contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. Not a place for some kid's journal or whatever. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 14:58, 22 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete, if this were their user page it would be speedied db-u5. Wish there were some way to speedy this, otherwise we'll need to keep an eye on it to make sure they don't post personal info of a minor. Storchy (talk) 15:06, 22 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Technically the entire thing is personal info of a minor (it contains their real name). Also, I agree that there should be a speedy deletion criteria for drafts that are obviously contrary to Wikipedia's purpose. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 15:09, 22 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete an editor who does not understand Wikipedia's purpose, and no point in userfying as it does not meet user page guidelines either. Pawnkingthree (talk) 16:38, 22 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete at a minimum, it may be worth someone contacting oversight about this since it is a completely inappropriate page containing the personal information of a child? 163.1.15.238 (talk) 10:49, 23 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Ya maybe. I'll see if they can do anything. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 10:56, 23 September 2022 (UTC)
 * I don't see any personal information other than two first names? Nothing that could actually identify her or her friend. Pawnkingthree (talk) 11:15, 23 September 2022 (UTC)
 * @Pawnkingthree Editors under 16 telling other people that they are under 16 is one of the things that routinely gets oversighted. 163.1.15.238 (talk) 13:19, 23 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Were you meaning to tell me that? Cause I already know that. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 13:21, 23 September 2022 (UTC)
 * @Blaze Wolf No, I was telling pawnkingthree, which was why I pinged them. 163.1.15.238 (talk) 13:22, 23 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Ah ok. Just wanted to make sure you didn't ping them when you meant to actually ping me. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 13:23, 23 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete: As an unsourced BLP SmokeyJoe (talk) 22:35, 23 September 2022 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.