Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Adipurush(film)

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  redirect to Draft:Adipurush. Salvio 06:41, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Adipurush(film)

 * – (View MfD)

This draft was an exact copy and paste of the draft, Draft:Adipurush SP013 (talk) 15:38, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Redirect, or do you think there is a behavioral problem? --SmokeyJoe (talk) 06:50, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
 * The normal response to a duplicate draft should be to redirect one copy to the other. Is there some reason not to do that here? None has been mentioned. DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 13:36, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Redirect - To answer the question, the reason for the delete nomination is that there seems to be a good-faith belief among some editors that duplicate stuff in draft space should be deleted rather than redirected. Robert McClenon (talk) 18:21, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.