Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Adisa Kabiru Adeniyi Kulukulu

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 06:36, 4 March 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Adisa Kabiru Adeniyi Kulukulu


Fails GNG per Articles for deletion/Adisa Kabiru where it was well debated. Legacypac (talk) 16:33, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Probably should be deleted per the AfD, but the recent activity, where Legacypac found it, moved it to DraftSpace, submitted it to have it rejected, was disruptive, and has wasted others' time. On discovery of the very old draft by an inactive editor, Legacypac should have blanked it.  That entirely fixes the problem to the degree that it needs fixing.  The AfD was contested, there remains the possibility of revival.  Legacypac, if you keep wasting others' time, more specific activity bans on you will need crafting.  Is that what you want?  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 03:47, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Are you trying to be a jerk today? The page was already an AfC submission and is less than 6 months old. The editor was evidently struggling with the proper process. We routinely move pages to DraftSpace. I was not aware of the AfD when I encountered the page while cleaning up drafts. Legacypac (talk) 04:00, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Not trying to be a jerk. This is a difficult notability question, the AfD is not quite compelling that a draft is not OK.  It is more than MfD is designed to handle.  You could ask the deleting admin.  I think the draft should be put back into her sandbox and blanked.  I am definitely against interfering with user sandboxes, with moving them or deleting them.  User sandboxes are for the user.  I think AfC templates in user sandboxes should be ignored, automatically.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 04:24, 25 February 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete - No indication that this is worth preserving in draft space; it would only be worth preserving in draft if there were a likelihood that it would pass notability, free of promotional stuff, within six months, and there is no such hope. Robert McClenon (talk) 15:31, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.