Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Aglar

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  delete. Fails WP:V as it is not on any official census list, and has been repeatedly resubmitted, so deletion is warranted. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 06:41, 17 April 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Aglar

 * – (View MfD)
 *  bibliomaniac 1  5  02:52, 10 April 2020 (UTC)

Resubmitted five times without improvement. Is not about to satisfy geographic notability, at least not with the current editor repeatedly submitting it. Robert McClenon (talk) 22:15, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Redirect, with prejudice, to Shopian district. Newcomers should be advised to add material to existing articles, not create new thin orphans. If Aglar is an important village in the Shopian district, sure the Shopian district article should cover it? —SmokeyJoe (talk) 00:19, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Comment Why is it that Wikipedia allows pages like this: Melita, California and thousands of other tiny settlements in the US that are either settled now or were in the past, but does not allow Indian villages of similar or larger size?— Naddruf (talk ~ contribs) 19:16, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
 * That’s a good question, but one very big problem is that the draft has no sources. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 22:48, 2 April 2020 (UTC)


 * Comment - User:Naddruf - The issue is verifiability. A legally recognized named place that is attested by at least one reliable source is geographically notable anywhere in the world.  That includes North America and South Asia.  This draft was repeatedly resubmitted without verification.  If it had had verification, I would have tagged it as needed copy-edit.  Robert McClenon (talk) 21:06, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
 * http://www.census2011.co.in/data/village/4682-agral-jammu-and-kashmir.html I can't figure out why this Indian census site is on the spam blacklist.— Naddruf (talk ~ contribs) 21:09, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
 * That site is not the official census site. http://censusindia.gov.in/ is the official site. There is a List of Towns and Their Population from the 2001 census. The list for Jammu and Kashmir does not list Aglar.   -- Whpq (talk) 13:39, 12 April 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  bibliomaniac 1  5  02:52, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete Per nom and per the above comment pointing out this is not in India's official census. There's no reason to allow this to continue to clog the system if there's no current hope of establishing notability. Sulfurboy (talk) 02:19, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.