Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Aircosmo Theory

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 09:57, 19 November 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Aircosmo Theory


Extremely non-notable fringe theory, with crap sourcing Orange Mike  &#124;  Talk  23:13, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
 * delete as above. The only source is self-published primary, abysmal quality, and uses a journal on Beall's List. The other sources are only there for the inevitable name-checking of Einstein and Tesla. Andy Dingley (talk) 23:19, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete, hopeless case, will never make it to mainspace. Guy (Help!) 23:51, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete, somebody is taking a lend. -Roxy the dog. barcus 10:23, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:VANITY. Not likely to rise to any other standard. jps (talk) 20:16, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete not useful at all. Legacypac (talk) 03:51, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.