Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Alien

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  delete. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 03:05, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

Draft:Alien

 * – (View MfD) Duplicate, also not notable. 🪐Kepler-1229b &#124; talk &#124; contribs🪐 18:17, 8 February 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete if not speedy delete duplicate. – Cupper 52 Discuss! 19:00, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete but if this was left alone it would have expired later this month. SK2242 (talk) 23:22, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Duplicate of what? "Duplicate" usually means Speedy Redirect, WP:SRE.  "Not notable" is not a reason to bring a draft to MfD, per WP:NMFD.   --SmokeyJoe (talk) 23:31, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Duplicate of extraterrestrial life. 🪐Kepler-1229b &#124; talk &#124; contribs🪐 19:12, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete as rejecting reviewer, concurring with SK2242 that the nomination awakened this alien from hibernation.  This didn't need deletion, but now it does.  Robert McClenon (talk) 06:43, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.