Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Alireza Jadidi

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure) &#8212;CX Zoom[he/him] (let's talk • {C•X}) 14:57, 28 September 2022 (UTC)

Draft:Alireza Jadidi

 * – (View MfD) &#8203;

Repeatedly-declined draft where the last submission had no non-token effort made to address issues. The sourcing on the draft itself isn't any good, either, and nothing shows up in Google (string: "alireza jadidi") so the likelihood this could be improved to be an acceptable article is also minimal. —Jéské Couriano v^&lowbar;^v  a little blue Bori 21:38, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete Has been declined 6 times. Helloheart   (talk)  21:48, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment: Creating editor has submitted for seventh time while still not understanding where to place references despite advice. I moved all refs to lead and advised editor to cut/paste the refs to better locations. I did not check refs to see if valid. The image is nominated for removal at Commons. David notMD (talk) 08:33, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Suggestion This seems to be a behavioural issue that is better solved with a block so that the creator is forced to communicate with us to catch up with article quality standards. If they still go WP:IDHT on this we can just extend their block in CIR grounds so that G13 naturally kicks in. The prose itself doesn't look too bad, just their refusal to inline-cite the article's information is an issue (but surmountable). Neutral on notability (I suspect a language barrier complicates things). — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 23:55, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Author is now legitimately trying to fix the referencing problems right now, so I change my vote to Keep. — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 15:35, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Please supply the diff that shows tendentious resubmission without improvement. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 09:14, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
 * He did attempt to put references but he and a second editor didn't reference all citable information. It is being fixed right now, will amend my vote. — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 15:34, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Likewise. Since they're now actively making an effort to bring things up to par, I'm withdrawing this MfD. —Jéské Couriano  v^&lowbar;^v  a little blue Bori 21:18, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.