Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Alishamraan

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  Speedy deleted by admin. (non-admin closure) —  csc -1 01:01, 27 February 2021 (UTC)

Draft:Alishamraan

 * – (View MfD) &#8203;

Draft is being tendentiously resubmitted with no sign that the submitter intends to improve it. If any evidence were to arise that the subject met notability guidelines then the draft could be rewritten, but there's nothing here that needs preserving. Paul &#10092;talk&#10093; 13:41, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete and ECP salt - reviewers time is being wasted by these disruptive resubmissions. SK2242 (talk) 13:45, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete - pretty clear case of tendentious resubmission of an article that is exceptionally unlikely to meet notability guidelines. ƒirefly  ( t · c ) 14:23, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete and stop wasting the reviewers' time. —  csc -1 14:28, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete and ECP Salt - This is about as clear a case for deletion as we are likely to see. This has been declined 5 times and rejected 5 times.  In my opinion, any resubmission after 1 rejection without first discussing is enough for either MFD or a partial block.  Robert McClenon (talk) 03:02, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete and salt. And the article moved to mainspace, which is Aliali - someone needs to draftify it. Tendentious resubmission warrants deletion. Pahunkat (talk) 08:51, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.