Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Amir Arta (2nd nomination)

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  speedy delete and block user. Don't waste time at MfD on spam like this. &mdash; RHaworth (talk · contribs) 17:19, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Amir Arta


This article has already been submitted 3 times to article space and deleted, and has been create-protected. This resubmission is tendentious.

This draft contains a confusing mixture of AH dates and CE dates, and is inconsistent in its use of person and gender, which raises competency issues. Robert McClenon (talk) 07:21, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete All Page creations and Block. Flagrant self promotion identically on all pages. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 08:39, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete So inconsistent that it appears like a hoax. CSD G4 might possibly apply considering this is the second nomination?  — Paleo  Neonate  – 15:35, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Comment to User:PaleoNeonate - I would have tagged one of them as G4 if there had been a deletion discussion, but it appears that all of the deletions have been speedy. G4 is available if there has already been a deletion discussion, such as this one.  Robert McClenon (talk) 22:46, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
 * True that there was not much discussion at the previous MfD. Thanks,  — Paleo  Neonate  – 22:50, 5 December 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete as self-promotion. -- Whpq (talk) 16:34, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.