Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Analysis of civil aviation accidents and incidents in the twenty-first century

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  delete. —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 21:08, 22 March 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Analysis of civil aviation accidents and incidents in the twenty-first century

 * – (View MfD)

The subject this draft is seeking to cover isn't appropriate for Wikipedia. The very title "Analysis of civil aviation accidents..." gives it away as a blatant violation of WP:OR. While this independent analysis is interesting, it's still a violation of WP:SYNTH and there is no way to improve the draft because the topic it's seeking to cover isn't appropriate for Wikipedia.

I get that this is rather harsh to say, but we shouldn't be encouraging further work on this draft by maintaining it indefinitely in draftspace. Chess (talk) Ping when replying 23:46, 11 March 2020 (UTC)


 * Userfy for User:Tina diuuuu, and advise her to get more experience editing related mainspace articles. This page can be consider notes to assist mainspace editing, but it is not a viable draft for a new page.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 23:50, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
 * The user in question hasn't edited for nearly a year, so it's unlikely that this'll be worked on by them FYI. Chess (talk) Ping when replying 00:48, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Chess, if you are not trying to teach the user something via MfD, then why did you bring it to MfD? It would have been deleted via G13 in due course.  Are you doing this to give us busywork?  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 03:20, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
 * It's still being occasionally edited/worked on by others. I brought it to MfD because there's no possible chance it'll be an article and the fact that the article might be subjected to G13 in 6 months isn't a reason not to delete it under MfD. Chess (talk) Ping when replying 03:36, 12 March 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete - It isn't a topic for an encyclopedia, but pure WP:OR and doesn't even come close to covering the subject, which would be a very long book. No point in userfying it, no potential to become an article, no matter how much work is done on it. - Ahunt (talk) 01:51, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete - The other editors who are working on it appear to be just tweaking a draft that isn't worth tweaking by a former editor. Robert McClenon (talk) 19:21, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete Wikipedia is not a repository of research articles. AngusWOOF  ( bark  •  sniff ) 16:52, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
 * delete. No need to warn the author, it looks like this was a part of college assignement one year ago back on Spring 2019 (see: User:Tina diuuuu), and they have not edited since. The subject of aviation accidents and incidents, namely in the 21st-century, is most likely notable. But this draft, though a good faith attempt, does not look as the start of that article / section - Nabla (talk) 11:14, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.