Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Andrew R. Nicholas

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  speedy delete. The page was speedy deleted by User:Fastily per WP:G7. North America1000 07:01, 17 August 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Andrew R. Nicholas


Apparent use as a person web page.  DGG ( talk ) 04:40, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
 * I don’t see the problem? It’s overly personal, but needing deletion?  —SmokeyJoe (talk) 07:48, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
 * I agree its more personal but that isn't my main intention. Since it is a draft I did go more personal until I submit it for review when I would have deleted any personal unnecessary details. However, as the page looks right now I actually agree to a nomination for deletion.--Excel23 (talk) 10:51, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Question - Is this an autobiography?
 * Comment - See Wikipedia is not a social medium. Reads like a social media profile.  Robert McClenon (talk) 15:06, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Like, but not very like. All biographies are a little bit like a social profile.  The critical difference is the inclusion of independent secondary sources.  Also, social biographies aren't written into unindexed locations where no one but Wikipedian's will find them.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 09:53, 16 August 2019 (UTC)
 * The page reads as a biography which I made intentional only in its draft form but when published it would be changed to conform to Wiki standards. It wasn't made as a social profile, which was never my intention, despite the current appearance. Sure all biographies are like a social profile but if, for example, Mr. Person has a Wiki that is a biography and notes nothing of importance then it makes no sense to have such a Wiki unless sources of Mr. Person and his importance says otherwise. This draft does have sources around I'm still looking to find them but in the mean time it does read as a biography only as a way for me to gather data together to support such information and if no information is found I will delete what is necessary. A biography is necessary for any article on a person but what a person does and his/her importance must be emphasized more than the biography of the person itself. However, I do understand what everyone is saying. It is entirely fine if the article is nominated for deletion unless said otherwise in here.--Excel23 (talk) 15:46, 16 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Question - Does the author have a conflict of interest, with the Nicholas or Moody families or anyone else? Robert McClenon (talk) 20:16, 16 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete pending a better explanation from the author. What they have posted above isn't helpful.  Robert McClenon (talk) 20:16, 16 August 2019 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.