Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Anja Ellwood

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: speedy delete. take your pick between G3 hoax and G10 BLP issues. —Kusma (t·c) 21:16, 8 November 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Anja Ellwood


Nonsense and an abuse of AfC Legacypac (talk) 19:10, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete: Inappropriate and possible outing, — Paleo Neonate  – 19:31, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Comment: the same can be found on the editor's talk page, possibly that revdel should be applied? — Paleo  Neonate  – 19:31, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Good points. I've tagged both the usertalk and Samara pages as attack pages. This was the start of a list of similar inappropriate pages, but I got pulled away. We can proceed on the Ellwood page alone if the CSD is accepted on the other one. Legacypac (talk) 19:49, 5 November 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete - isn't there an appropriate WP:SPEEDY category that would cover this rather than have to take it to MfD? Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 20:15, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Maybe G3 or G10 — Paleo Neonate  – 20:19, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.