Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Anjum lucknowi

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  speedy deleted per G5. (non-admin closure) Nathan2055talk - contribs 03:21, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Anjum lucknowi

 * – (View MfD)

Please see Articles for deletion/Anjum Lucknowi (poet) and also Sockpuppet investigations/Khan tabrez. This nomination is simply to flag this for potential deletion, likely to be speeded when the sockpuppet investigation confirms it to have been created by a blocked editor post block Fiddle   Faddle  11:12, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
 * I would agree to delete per Articles for deletion/Anjum Lucknowi (poet), but do not bring preemptive SPI matters to MfD, let the SPI play out. Don’t try to clerk SPI at mfd.  —SmokeyJoe (talk) 13:26, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete as per User:SmokeyJoe. The AFD is a reason to delete, in view of the gaming by moving the article between draft space and article space.  An SPI is not a reason to delete a draft until the socks are blocked.  Robert McClenon (talk) 01:09, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
 * As per my post here, MfD-ing SPI blocked socks, is more contrary to DENY than any benefit, and is not a good reason for nominating at MfD. If there is no applicable CSD criterion, not G5 or any other, then better to ignore.  Ignored drafts with be deleted under G13, and is an excellent way to deny recognition.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 01:34, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.