Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Anurag Anand (director & producer)

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete. Consensus is to delete, so I am closing as delete to abide by that. However if wishes to restore the draft in order to take responsibility for promoting it to mainspace, I have no objection and don't consider that wheel-warring. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 22:10, 2 July 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Anurag Anand (director & producer)


Draft has been declined 4 times for the same reason, and it seems the submittor is not even looking at the declines and is just resubmitting it. &raquo; Shadowowl  &#124;  talk  13:34, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete. Promotion, not notable. Sources are not suitable, not reliable, the third is a single mention. Advise the author to instead improve the entry at IMDB. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 13:46, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete - As per nominator, submitter doesn't even seem to be paying attention to the reviewer comments (which are the same every time). Robert McClenon (talk) 18:58, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete per precedent. Don't resubmit over and over expecting a different result. Legacypac (talk) 16:54, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep Seriously consider promotion to mainspace. As per WP:CREATIVE, sources about the work are sources about the creator, and there seem to be sufficient of those to establish notability, although a few more would be better. I agree that normally Amazon is not a reliable source, but when Amazon prime is the producing company, then their descriptions became reliable, although not independent, just as we would always consider content from the studio or production company for any film. DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 19:44, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep in draft another 6 months for to work on. I don't think it's viable in mainspace without  some 3rd party resliable sources  to show the films are important, but any established editor who wants to rescue something here should have the chance to do so.  DGG ( talk ) 16:31, 2 July 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.