Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Anushka Sen (3rd nomination)

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  keep. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 01:17, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

Draft:Anushka Sen

 * – (View MfD)

It is, yet again, time for the wider community to have a serious look at this draft. WP:BEFORE research by me, by the draft creator and by others over time has failed to find anything substantial in WP:RS to indicate that this song lady passed WP:NACTOR. It has been deleted as an article as a Draft, as sandboxen, and has caused many of us to scratch our heads over it in order to try to accept it.

It is likely that Anushka Sen will pass our threshold of notability at some point in her career. At present it is WP:TOOSOON.

I will be the first to change my mind if she can be shown to have significant independent coverage in reliable sources. Research has shown me social media, TV gossip journalism, TV listings and general fluff and clutter. Fiddle  Faddle  16:56, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep in draft space at this time, partially reversing my position six months ago:
 * This is a draft, and the question is whether to delete it from draft space, which should only be done if its presence in draft space has become disruptive. This draft has only been submitted and declined once in its present version.
 * Editors have said that the subject is likely to satisfy acting notability soon. If so, a draft is useful, unless it is abused.
 * If this draft is again resubmitted tendentiously, semi-protection and partial blocks are preferred over deletion of the draft from draft space.
 * The title is already salted in article space, so that there is no danger of an inappropriate article being created.
 * There is no need to delete this draft at this time. Robert McClenon (talk) 18:51, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:NMFD, especially due to the statement that it is likely the subject will become notable. —  csc -1 19:59, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep. WP:TOOSOON is a reason for it to be in draftspace. MfD is not for examining draft notability. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 20:35, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep - per Joe - MFD isn't for examining notability and the nom themselves state "It is likely that Anushka Sen will pass our threshold of notability at some point in her career." so I don't really know why this was nominated but either way I see no valid reason to delete at this time. – Davey 2010 Talk 22:10, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep I would also go by WP:NMFD, due to the statement that it is likely the subject will become notable although I totally understand your feelings.CommanderWaterford (talk) 23:21, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:NMFD. Draftspace may be used to draft content that one reasonably believes will become notable. — Godsy (TALK CONT ) 07:15, 15 February 2021 (UTC)


 * Comment -- There is a prior history here: Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Anushka Sen (2nd nomination) David notMD (talk) 23:17, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment It is an obvious keep, but it puzzles me why the article has not been promoted to mainspace. Here is an announcement of a new series she has starring in . This is the third television series she is in. She also has 14.7million Instagram followers, also indicative of an established actor. You cannot accrue that many followers, without being widely known. It is nigh on impossible. She has been in 14 adverts . She has the lead role in Jhansi Ki Rani  We really need to look to see why it is not been promoted.    scope_creep Talk  12:50, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.