Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:AriArt

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  nomination withdrawn as the pages have been speedied as sockpuppetry by a banned editor. Bearcat (talk) 19:44, 31 October 2018 (UTC)

Draft:AriArt


WP:AUTOBIO (creator's username = MissAriArt) about a person, referenced entirely to YouTube videos and jpgs rather than any evidence of reliable source coverage about her. This is quite possibly an outright WP:HOAX as well, because literally all of the claims of notability here completely fail to verify anywhere. She purportedly (1) wrote a novel series whose article and coverage completely fail to mention her as the author of even one of the novels; (2) hosted television shows whose articles and coverage completely fail to mention her as having ever hosted them; and (3) stars in a new television series whose actual star sources as Kiernan Shipka, not Ariana Smith -- and even the YouTube videos that are being used as "sources" for her YouTube work are from a YouTube channel whose creator gives her name as Danika, not Ariana or AriArt, so not only are they primary sources that don't count as support for a person's notability in the first place, they're not even verifying themselves as even being the work of this article subject at all. Further, there have been at least three different anonymous IP numbers involved in persistently revert-warring me every time I try to remove this draft from the articlespace categories that WP:DRAFTNOCAT prohibits it from being filed in. Basically, this whole thing smells like a giant crock of bull droppings -- but even draftspace has rules about not retaining hoaxes. Bearcat (talk) 21:08, 28 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete for at least three reasons. First, it is not a blatant hoax, but it may be a hoax anyway, so it is MFD rather than G3.  Second, it is an autobiography, and we have too many of those.  Third, the page is reference-bombed with YouTube, and reference-bombing a page with an unreliable source isn't the usual issue, but is another issue.  Robert McClenon (talk) 14:24, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.