Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Art, For Fucks Sake

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  delete. ✗ plicit  23:47, 14 April 2022 (UTC)

Draft:Art, For Fucks Sake

 * – (View MfD) &#8203;

Pure WP:OR, and depressing since an instructor has set an injudicious project, top the disadvantage of the students. Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents is discussing the project 🇺🇦 Fiddle Timtrent  Faddle Talk to me 🇺🇦 20:53, 7 April 2022 (UTC)


 * Delete Violation of no original research, like you said, and also what Wikipedia is not. --LPS and MLP Fan (Littlest Pet Shop and My Little Pony Fan) 20:58, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Do drafts actually get deleted for non-notability? I assumed they usually just languished in AfC forever. Regardless, the summary of the short story should be merged to Come Let Us Sing Anyway, the notable collection that the story is in. ~ L 🌸  (talk) 00:43, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete part of a series of WP:NOTWEBHOST book reports. Just nip it in the bud, notability standards for drafts don’t matter when there’s no chance in hell it’s becoming an article. Dronebogus (talk) 07:35, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment to User:LEvalyn - Drafts are not deleted for lack of notability, although MFD does see efforts to delete drafts for reasons that amount to lack of notability. They are deleted from draft space for lack of use as G13 if they are not edited for six months.  Robert McClenon (talk) 14:51, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.