Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Asuran (soundtrack)

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  Withdrawn. Nominator asked to withdraw, and the only comment making a specific !vote is conditional on the existence of a main space article, which was already deleted. RL0919 (talk) 17:35, 15 August 2021 (UTC)

Draft:Asuran (soundtrack)

 * – (View MfD) &#8203;

This is definitely the work of User:Satish Raman Nair, and must be deleted since he created this in violation of WP:BLOCKEVADE. Kailash29792 (talk)  05:33, 9 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Definitely? If you can explain briefly, use WP:CSD. If you can’t, and it requires thought, then use WP:SPI. Do not do shadow SPI work at MfD, unless you are accredited as an SPI clerk or better. Read User:Blablubbs/How to file a good SPI. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 08:59, 9 August 2021 (UTC)
 * See also Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Nadhigalile Neeradum Suriyan -- RoySmith (talk) 13:50, 9 August 2021 (UTC)
 * If this exists in the mainspace then the draft article should be redirected to it, especially since the draft seems to have the exact same content as the mainspace article and as such will need to be kept for attribution purposes. 192.76.8.91 (talk) 14:41, 9 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment - This appears to be a strange case that is very hard to assume good faith. User:Kailash29792 - Please explain why you copied a draft that you state is the work of a block evader from draft space to article space, without attribution, and then requested deletion of the draft.  Robert McClenon (talk) 16:34, 9 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Withdraw: Alright, I've been acting like a dick of lately (sorry if this counts as profanity). I realise that in good faith I was actually doing the wrong things. But I hope this makes it to the mainspace and does not get deleted even after Satish's IP has been exposed. Since WP:G5 says, "When a blocked or banned person uses an alternate account (sockpuppet) to avoid a restriction, any pages created via the sock account after the earliest block or ban of any of that person's accounts qualify for G5 (if not substantially edited by others)". I'll spend that time improving this, and hope it gets accepted. -- Kailash29792 (talk)  04:23, 11 August 2021 (UTC)
 * See also WP:AN. -- RoySmith (talk) 13:46, 11 August 2021 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.