Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Athanasios Fragkos

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was Keep. — xaosflux  Talk 13:54, 21 September 2014 (UTC)

Draft:Athanasios Fragkos


This is essentially advertising for a non-notable  dermatologist. The draft has been rejected three times by three different editors, and has been submitted yet again There does not appear to be any indication that any possible improvements in the article are likely to show that  the individual will   pass the notability requirements.  DGG ( talk ) 21:48, 13 September 2014 (UTC)


 * I don't agree that MfD is the place for this. The author is still working on it, albeit without much current success. THat may be because Athanasios Fragkos isn't notable or it may be because they lack experience. While I am entirely unsure that the draft will ever be good enough to accept I have no access to original language sources. I suggest we keep and allow the WP:AFC process to continue. Have we actually helped the author at all? Fiddle   Faddle  14:05, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

Cristina Voinea Andreea (talk) 15:21, 14 September 2014 (UTC) Hello. Thank you very much for all the comments and remarks you guys have made. I am still trying to find sources in english, although I am not sure I will be able to improve the references very soon. I have tried to improve my article, and I do not necessarily want it to be published in the actual form. If you won't proceed with the deletion of the draft, I will continue to work on it. I am not sure if the deletion was proposed because I am not allowed to submit an article for revison more than three times, but if this is not the reason, I would suggest to let me improve it. If it is not good enough it wont be published, but maybe I have a good chance of creating an article suited for Wikipedia and moreover I would like to get the necessary experience to create further useful articles. Hopefully there is no harm done in my (so far) faild attempts. Cristina Voinea Andreea (talk) 15:21, 14 September 2014 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.