Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:B4blaze (newspaper)

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  soft delete. Anyone can use WP:REFUND to request it be undeleted. Legoktm (talk) 04:43, 14 October 2022 (UTC)

Draft:B4blaze (newspaper)

 * – (View MfD) &#8203;

The page is clearly not proven to be notable, it has been in draft for more than six months without any actual content edits, but since the admin reverted CSD G13 nomination, I am nominating it for MFD. It should be noted that the draft is about an article which has been rejected multiple times by reviewers and will likely not be accepted in its current state. – — Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.89.236.60 (talk) 06:13, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: I created this nomination page per request (Special:Permalink/1114226397) by at Help desk and do not endorse or oppose the nomination at this moment. &#8212;CX Zoom[he/him] (let's talk • {C•X}) 12:41, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Soft delete because this would have been G13-ed were it no for the nominator's actions in preemptively tagging it for speedy deletion. * Pppery * it has begun... 13:15, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete as accidentally saved from old age. A minnow  trout to the nominator for complicating things by doing what they didn't understand without registering an account.  Robert McClenon (talk) 16:33, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Leave for G13. 6 months is not a special time.  If no one looks, after 6 months it goes.  When someone messes the process in your opinion, don’t bring it to MfD to fix it.  It doesn’t need fixing, just leave for G13.  Don’t reward busyworkers.  —SmokeyJoe (talk) 07:36, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Also, tell IPs to register before engaging in projectspace. Accountability is important. SmokeyJoe (talk) 07:37, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Can't agree on that. IPs who engage in project space are mostly very constructive, and the fact that this MfD has garnered 2 soft/weak delete !votes so far indicates that the IP isn't wholly out of step with the community. &#8212;CX Zoom[he/him] (let's talk • {C•X}) 08:05, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
 * In projectspace, including MfD, editors can harass other editors, and hiding behind an IP makes it practically impossible to connect to the main account. Good faith IPs may be constructive, but you can’t easily track whether they are learning.  Then, there’s the practical benefit of being able to create the MfD page, and of generally being able to use tools like Twinkle.
 * IP editing in mainspace has to be protected to keep the barrier to editing very low, but this is not the case in projectspace. You should not be engaging in projectspace if you don’t understand the place, and if you understand the place, either you agree that WP:registering is a good idea, or there’s some issue of avoiding connection to a main account and sockpuppetry. SmokeyJoe (talk) 11:25, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete Bureaucracies between registered users and IPs aside, the draft is obviously not going to get published, neither some one has actually improved it in more than 6 months. Delete as per WP:SNOW. --116.71.185.220 (talk) 04:12, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.