Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Bartoli Family

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was delete. (Note: the mainspace page has been deleted as a hoax). JohnCD (talk) 19:53, 1 May 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Bartoli Family


Draft of a page which exists in mainspace and is being considered for deletion at Articles for deletion/Bartoli family Eagleash (talk) 15:35, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. It's the same hoax as the Bartoli family. Sam Sailor Talk! 15:59, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete No element of this story from Augusto Giovanni Bartoli forward can be confirmed in reliable sources. This is probably a hoax and the author ought to be blocked for persistent disruptive behavior. Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 19:28, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Weak delete - This appears to be an attempt to game the system as an end run around AFD for the main article. On the other hand, the deletion standards for MFD should be much stricter than AFD.  How does one prove that something centuries old is a hoax?  Robert McClenon (talk) 22:33, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment The draft 'pre-dates' the creation of the first Bartoli family page but only by a few minutes. There is nothing that is 'centuries old' because as far as we can tell it never existed. The author, having been notified of deletion discussions on en.wiki and at commons, has not defended their work as yet. It is for them to demonstrate that it is genuine. Eagleash (talk) 22:39, 24 April 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.