Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Benitez City

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 00:14, 15 April 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Benitez City


Adding the walled garden:

No results on Google, no sources, date indicates it was likely made up Jjjjjjdddddd (talk) 05:23, 7 April 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete - The author seems to have created a walled garden of unsourced articles on places in Tulsa. I;m going to attempt to bundle.  Robert McClenon (talk) 20:07, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep all and restore content to those that were blanked. No policy-based reason for deletion has been stated. "Unsourced" is not a reason to delete a draft. DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 20:14, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Comment - Don't dump on the nominator for not bundling. Bundling is hard work.  I have bundled all of these, except for one that has population numbers that can't possibly be true, which is a hoax.  Robert McClenon (talk) 20:18, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
 * comment I am restoring the content to all of them . Blanking a page in the middle of a discussion is not usually helpful, unless of course it is copyvio.  DGG ( talk ) 01:24, 8 April 2018 (UTC);
 * Comment - I would go a little further and say that blanking a page that is subject to a deletion discussion is disruptive editing unless it is being blanked pending redaction or suppression. Copyvio and attack pages are the sort of things that never should have existed and really are subject to redaction.  Robert McClenon (talk) 03:30, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Comment - I also consider blanking of stupid drafts to be a questionable practice, but I know there are some editors who think that stupid drafts should be blanked. Robert McClenon (talk) 03:30, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete all. There are thousands of useless problematic drafts oit there if someone wants to go blanking content. It's not ok to blank the ones someone else is trying to Delete. As for the Keep vote - Keep suggests this is good for mainspace - which it's not at all. Making such votes is disruptive. Legacypac (talk) 05:19, 14 April 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.