Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Bienvenido Bones Banez, Jr.

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: keep. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 03:30, 22 July 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Bienvenido Bones Banez, Jr.

 * &thinsp;&mdash; Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs)&thinsp; 18:45, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
 * &thinsp;&mdash; Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs)&thinsp; 18:45, 13 July 2018 (UTC)

Self-aggrandizing autobiography of obscure artist-occultist; no significant evidence of notability (I believe I detect a touch of effort to claim notability by connection to the subjects with which he is obsessed). Orange Mike &#124;  Talk  16:24, 7 July 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep per WP:NMFD. Graeme Bartlett must have seen something promising in the draft because they recently saved it from G13. — Godsy (TALK CONT ) 16:51, 7 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Comment it already was deleted by G13, and then restored on request by user:Bienvenido Bones Banez, Jr. at WP:REFUND. Normally a refund request for a g13 will be honoured, unless another speedy delete reason applies. I think that the draft should get another chance for improvement before G13 strikes again. There is no big hurry to scrap the draft. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:44, 7 July 2018 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, &thinsp;&mdash; Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs)&thinsp; 18:45, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.