Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Bill Bucklew

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 01:26, 20 November 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Bill Bucklew


Deemed unsuitable. The creator has been blocked for having a username the same a famous person, which matches the article title. So either this person is notable and the username block is justified or they are not notable and this is just self promotion. Legacypac (talk) 00:20, 12 November 2018 (UTC) See comments from the creator here. Legacypac (talk) 01:09, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Borderline notable. A heap of news from Dec 2017 - Feb 2018.  Not a very good draft.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 00:34, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
 * I'm almost certain it's an autobiography based on the sources and photos. It may not be notable, but it's at least notable enough to merit discussion, even if it is a SPA/autobiography, which would merit a keep in draft space. Also, it seems asinine that someone would be blocked for having the name of a famous person if the person isn't famous enough for an article. SportingFlyer  talk  02:29, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Asinine? Superficially, yes; but this account persists in insisting that Bill Bucklew is a famous person. I'm taking them at their word that they, at least, think that he is famous; and if that is so, then they shouldn't be using his name unless they are him. -- Orange Mike &#124;  Talk  04:38, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes a little strange. Given the page has been tagged "do not resubmit" and the username block and the possibility they are notable, I felt a deletion discussion was warrented. Legacypac (talk) 05:41, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
 * It's actually quite an interesting premise, this MfD. Even with the SPA/possible WP:PROMO concerns, I still think someone could still take this article and at least make a run at notability. SportingFlyer  talk  10:04, 12 November 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete - Already rejected. Since we are here, send it to the bit bucket.  Robert McClenon (talk) 04:59, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.