Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Birdnest

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  procedural close. Page was deleted by under G11. (non-admin closure) Invalid OS (talk) 12:27, 15 October 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Birdnest

 * – (View MfD)

Not a public person, no claims of significance and therefore a BLP violation. Atlantic306 (talk) 15:53, 12 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep Claims of significance are only relevant in article space, and have nothing to do with BLP decisions in any space.. WP:BLP says that: I do not see that any of the content here is Contentious, and if it is not, then BLP does not apply, as indicated in WP:BLPTALK. This draft has surely not yet established notability, and may nevere do so. As such it may well not wind up in article space.  But that is not a reason for deletion, unless it is abandoned for 6 months or more so that G13 applies. It is not an attack page, nor a copyvio, nor do any of the other WP:CSDs seem to me to apply. Indeed I see no valid deletion reason which currently applies to this draft. DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 20:14, 12 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: The nominator tagged this page with a G6 (housekeeping) speedy which I declined. DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 20:17, 12 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete, nothing worth keeping here in any space, no reason to keep it around. person has not established notability and only sources are YouTube. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 23:01, 12 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Neutral - It's a draft. It's a worthless draft.  It doesn't need keeping, but there is no reason for deleting it from draft space.  Tagging it for G6 was a good-faith error.  G6 shouldn't be used to get rid of crud solely because it is crud.  Robert McClenon (talk) 03:11, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete G11. Agree, tagging G6 was wrong.  G11 applies because it is promotional and all sources are unreliable, and promotional, which means that nothing on the page can be edited for improvement because it is entirely unreliable.  TNT would apply if notable, but it is not nearly notable, it is a young teenager WP:NOTWEBHOSTing to promote his music and YouTube channel.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 03:24, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.