Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Black and white cookie

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  delete. ✗ plicit  02:32, 20 July 2021 (UTC)

Draft:Black and white cookie

 * – (View MfD) &#8203;

WP:POVFORK of Black and white cookie by a user who is now permabanned. The additional citations are largely non-reliable, redundant, or don't support the text they're attached to. Apocheir (talk) 16:23, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete or selective merge. Wow, this is a weird one.  Looking at the author's edit history, they were on an editing spree promoting the city of Utica, New York.  The writing is poor and most of the sources are dubious, but the little bit that's well sourced could possibly be merged into Black and white cookie.  -- RoySmith (talk) 17:25, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete: Old fork, it is an attribution hazard if used, and nothing useful was done SmokeyJoe (talk) 22:16, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete as a POV content fork. It isn't worth the effort of determining whether this blocked  user contributed anything useful. Robert McClenon (talk) 00:32, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete as a POV fork. Rubbish computer (Talk: Contribs) 15:01, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.