Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Brandi Neidlein

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  delete. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 13:13, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

Draft:Brandi Neidlein

 * – (View MfD)

possible blp violation, for all we know.  DGG ( talk ) 05:12, 24 January 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete - Wikipedia is not a web host. This is not the draft of anything that could conceivably become an article.-- Whpq (talk) 20:13, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete - It's a draft,and a useless draft. Robert McClenon (talk) 21:15, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete as an unsourced BLP. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 02:08, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Snow delete Hopelessly non-notable, and clearly not a genuine attempt at an encyclopaedia article. Also, Category:Miscellaneous pages for deletion seems to be indexed by Google, so having pages such as these at MfD could actually be harmful. I'm flabbergasted by the opposition to speedying pages like this. Adam9007 (talk) 02:40, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete: yeah no this is entirely useless. G11 might very well be an option I daresay.  Java Hurricane  15:47, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
 * I want to mention that for drafts like this if it is clear that the individual is likely to be below high school age, I delete giving blp as the reason.  DGG ( talk ) 06:50, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.