Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Bredon cohomology (2nd nomination)

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  Moved to mainspace during the discussion so Withdraw. Legacypac (talk) 16:33, 1 March 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Bredon cohomology


We agreed to merge this page over a year ago. When it came up for G13 (again) that was declined because of the previous MfD result which everyone should read Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Bredon cohomology Over a year is plenty of time to merge the page, so presuming this was already done and since the creator suggested the merge, I redirected the page. That was reverted. So the best idea now is to delete so we don't leave a Draft content fork hanging around forever. Legacypac (talk) 15:46, 1 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Merge/Keep: as before. The consensus can change of course, but I don’t think that’s the case here; for example, the topic is still not covered in mainspace as far as I know. —- Taku (talk) 15:49, 1 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Merge immediately or delete - it's not clear whether this draft is intended as work on the Bredon cohomology theory or the Bredon equivariant cohomology theory, which as far as I've been able to research are related but separate things. There's not enough work done on the draft to determine which it is, nor sufficient content that a layperson (such as myself) can determine what to merge or where, the sources provided are offline or paywalled, and the sources available online are too jargon-y to make sense of, at least to me. This sentence fragment has been sitting in the draft space untouched for nearly five years now, and just keeps coming back around for more drama once a year. If Taku or some other mathematics expert can deal with this draft before the conclusion of this discussion then it's a win for everyone, but if not then I will delete it myself per WP:IAR to end this slow-moving battle once and for all. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 16:13, 1 March 2019 (UTC)
 * What the heck is this? Legacypac (talk) 16:23, 1 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Well, I was being sarcastic. The root of the problem was no one willing to just address the draft; merge/move. I have simply moved the draft to mainspace to save everyone’s time (I’m too busy right now for drama). —- Taku (talk)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.