Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:BreeAnna Marie

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  delete. Ricky81682 (talk) 04:59, 26 March 2016 (UTC)

Draft:BreeAnna Marie


This is an unreferenced draft about a living person, but its author, who is a corporate account that acts as her agent, has been blocked. Unless someone is willing with seven days to "adopt" this article and improve it, it should be deleted. Robert McClenon (talk) 21:42, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Not unreferenced. Blocking of author is not a reason for deletion.  Imposition of a seven day deadline is not policy nor supportable.
 * Instead, speedy delete per WP:CSD the tidies and most clear cut criterion already used today to delete the same thing in mainspace, BreeAnna Marie, done by User:KrakatoaKatie. Undoubtedly blatant promotion.  Not also the G12 rationale, copyright infringement of the source noted in the deletion log, which means that it is not appropriate to suggest that someone adopt this.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 04:52, 16 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete same as mainspace version Legacypac (talk) 04:17, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.