Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:British Rail Class 91

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  delete. Liz Read! Talk! 06:10, 27 November 2022 (UTC)

Draft:British Rail Class 91

 * – (View MfD) &#8203;

The draft is an old copy of a mainspace article that was created without appropriate attribution (see WP:COPIES), and it hasn't been constructively edited since it was rejected for AfC over seven months ago in March (see WP:STALE). XAM2175 (T) 11:53, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. XtraJovial (talk • contribs) 21:54, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. —  Sundostund  mppria  (talk / contribs) 22:01, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom -- Lenticel ( talk ) 01:36, 21 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete. The G13 removal was correct as the last human edits were in August (and any human edit that isn't adding a speedy deletion tag counts), however, we have a well-developed article at British Rail Class 91 and there is no reason why any improvements shouldn't be made to that article directly. Thryduulf (talk) 12:14, 21 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the clarification on the G13 rules. XAM2175  (T) 14:17, 21 November 2022 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.