Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Bronwyn Haltom

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  delete. Mz7 (talk) 17:24, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Bronwyn Haltom

 * – (View MfD)

Appears to be an attack page, albeit not close enough for deletion under G10. Train of Knowledge (Talk) 05:36, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete Per nom. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 09:53, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Arguably still qualifies for G10. Should not be kept around for 6 months. Spicy (talk) 01:56, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete - Agree that it is not G10, but that it is close to G10. Being close to G3 or G10 or G11 is reason to delete at MFD, just as being close to A7 is reason to delete at AFD.  (Neither A7 nor close to A7 is reason to delete at MFD, but no one asked that.)  Robert McClenon (talk) 00:43, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete but allow for rewrite. This could be rewritten neutrally, saying she's a former white house aide and candidate. But she would have to be elected to meet WP:NPOLITICIAN  Angus W🐶🐶F  ( bark  •  sniff ) 16:51, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete if not updated by author, but I think it would be trivial to remove the negative parts. Most of the article is not defamatory. { $$\mathbb{JPG}$$ } 01:59, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete unless the author expresses an interest in rewriting it under a WP:NPOV. Nathan2055talk - contribs 21:27, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.