Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Buchalter

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  speedy delete (G5). MER-C 18:27, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Buchalter


This was deleted under WP:G11 (advertising), and recreated by a new user, who I assume to be a sock of the now-blocked original creator. -- RoySmith (talk) 22:19, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: the draft's creator has now been blocked as sock/meat (and yet another copy of this, at User:WorldTraveler63/sandbox/Buchalter, deleted). To answer SmokeyJoe's query below, the purpose of this XfD is to establish a consensus to delete, so the next sock that comes along and tries again, we can WP:G4 it.    -- RoySmith (talk) 12:54, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Heh, found another one, these guys get around. This should be blanked and the user blocked:
 * -- RoySmith (talk) 17:49, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
 * G11, spamublock-- Dloh cier ekim  (talk) 18:27, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
 * G11, spamublock-- Dloh cier ekim  (talk) 18:27, 9 May 2018 (UTC)


 * G11 applies no less in draftspace than mainspace. What is the question? —SmokeyJoe (talk) 22:54, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Hello. I am not a sock puppet of the former user mentioned. I am a paid editor of Buchalter. I have removed all "unambiguous advertising or promotion" of the firm and have written this plainly as an encyclopedia entry. Can you please specify what the WP:G11 violation was or content entered was? I am happy to delete this. We have tried continuously to create an article that meets all Wikipedia's guidelines and seem to continuously be flagged. I have denoted on my talk page as well as the talk page of this article my affiliation with this subject. Please provide constructive advice on how to maintain this article?AutumnLeaves95 (talk) 23:26, 8 May 2018 (UTC)AutumnLeaves95
 * That would be the answer to your question, : this isn't G11. Also, this doesn't look to me like sockpuppetry, so not G5., I'll respond with feedback on your talk page. In the meantime, I say we keep this. Nothing damaging about it, and there's an editor currently interested in improving it. —Compassionate727 (T·C) 00:11, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
 * The checkuser has spoken: it was indeed a sockpuppet. Speedy delete per CSD G5. —Compassionate727 (T·C) 12:47, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
 * delete As a matter of form, I do not delete a page more than once.-- Dloh cier ekim  (talk) 14:34, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.