Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Bud Pierce

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  Merge. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:44, 27 November 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Bud Pierce


Draft no longer needed; we have Bud Pierce. -- Another Believer ( Talk ) 19:35, 17 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete per nominator. MB298 (talk) 00:43, 18 November 2016 (UTC)


 * (ec) History merge.  deserves more recognition.  Sure,  appears to have created a later independent version, no reference or use of Black Dogg's drafting, but that is not a good thing.  This is clear evidence of AfC being broken, and this MfD would hide the evidence!  I agree with Black Dogg's complaint to the reviewer, User:SwisterTwister, in that reviewers are holding drafters to too-high standard.  As a consequence, no one is well-advised to use AfC, everyone who wants recognition and quality help should write directly into mainspace.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 00:50, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
 * changing my position to history merge after reading your comment. MB298 (talk) 00:53, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
 * That is very kind of you. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 00:59, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
 * History merge suffices. SwisterTwister   talk  00:58, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment as nominator: I am fine with a history merge, too. Sorry if MfD wasn't the best channel. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 01:52, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.