Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Bye Bye Parabens

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 18:19, 4 July 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Bye Bye Parabens


Non-notable company, spammily praising "an international award winning celebrity master hair stylist" who owns the company, but is not celebrity enough to have any article or even redlinks here. No sources, no credible assertion of notability, and a creator who is apparently a freelance spammer (a/k/a undisclosed paid editor with a COI). Orange Mike &#124;  Talk  23:32, 26 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. Either G11 or WP:TNT.  Company, description, company website.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 03:33, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. The creator is suspected of editing while paid, without disclosure, he's not proven to be doing so - however, the article itself is still a pile of garbage which wouldn't pass even the most basic of tests of notability.  Needs to go.  Dane &#124; Geld  20:55, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete per above, though I think the undisclosed paid editing can be proven (as much as you can prove anything on the internet) per WP:COIN. Smallbones( smalltalk ) 22:23, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete per G11. VQuakr (talk) 07:49, 29 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - I probably wouldn't have G11'd at AFC, but would have left a G11 tag standing. Robert McClenon (talk) 00:52, 2 July 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.